How to Stop Fighting
Step #5
Effective Negotiation

A_136 (16K)

Option A. Convince your partner to go to Florida.


This approach is called "positional bargaining."

Each side takes one position and they argue for it.

They may even start with a position more extreme than what they really want, so they have some negotiating room.

So, if a positional bargainer really wanted to go to Florida, he might first suggest that he and his partner go to Hawaii for the extreme position. Then when his partner balks, he could "back down" to Florida and appear more reasonable!

Advantages and disadvantages:

Disadvantages:

  • Positional bargaining narrows the options. The only way for one side to win is for the other to lose.
  • Or, you can try to compromise, but that may not satisfy either side.
  • In that case, a settlement may not be reached at all.
  • Positional bargaining can get rather adversarial. As each side argues more and more strongly for their position, they may get frustrated or angry at the intransigence of the other.
  • This can lead to the deterioration of the relationship.

Advantages:

  • Positional bargaining keeps the focus of the negotiation narrow. If you broaden it out to include other interests, it can get "messier."
  • This is the approach most people know and usually start with.
      Stop Fighting:  Home | Steps | Index | Feedback      CRInfo Home
 

CRInfo Version V
Copyright © 1999-2007 The Conflict Resolution Information Source
CRInfo™ is a Registered Trademark of the University of Colorado

Project Acknowledgements

The Conflict Resolution Information Source
Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors
c/o Conflict Information Consortium (Formerly Conflict Research Consortium), University of Colorado
Campus Box 580, Boulder, CO 80309
Phone: (303) 492-1635; Fax: (303) 492-2154; Contact

University of Colorado at Boulder